Skip to main content

Table 1 Barriers and facilitators to anal cancer screening in MSM synthesized from all studies

From: Barriers and facilitators to anal cancer screening among men who have sex with men: a systematic review with narrative synthesis

Factors

Facilitators

Barriers

Individual factors

Age

 

Younger age [32]

Race

Black race [21]

Non-Hispanic Black race [32]

Racialized groups [52]

Sexual orientation

Homosexuals [59]

Heterosexual men [52], bisexual or queer [59]

Resource

Availability of the screening test [21, 54, 57]

Education from a health care provider or accept education program [36, 54]

Having insurance coverage [21]

Having a high annual household income [22]

Financial distress [30, 32, 42, 47, 51, 55, 57]

Lack of availability of the screening test [39, 56]

Lack of time for participating due to work, traffic etc. [43, 57]

Education

More years of school [59]

Not having a college degree [32]

Health condition

Living with HIV[21, 22, 39, 51]

Self-observed, other perceived or diagnosed anal disease or physical symptoms [21, 30, 31, 45, 57]

Family history of cancer[57]

Living with HIV [59]

Not experiencing anal cancer symptoms [57]

Mental health conditions [42]

Health behavior

Previous history of anal cancer screening [21, 22]

Higher levels of sexual activity (i.e., anal receptive sexual partners) in the previous six months [21, 31]

Not disclosed their sexual behavior with men to their primary health care provider [22]

Not having anal receptive sexual intercourse [32]

Health literacy

Greater perceived knowledge about anal cancer screening, anal cancer, HPV, vaccination and associated risk [22, 31, 37, 39, 43, 46, 57]

Lack of knowledge related HPV, anal cancer, and anal screening [32, 35, 39–45, 47, 49, 50, 55–58]

Lack of awareness and concern of disease risk [35, 38–40, 42, 45, 49, 56, 57]

Uncertainty about the effectiveness and possible side effect of anal cancer screening [32, 48, 52]

Uncertain about their doctor’s recommendation [52]

Psychology

Worry about getting anal cancer and being very concerned about anal cancer [21, 22, 39, 43]

Less anal sex stigma [54]

High tolerance for any pain experienced [43]

Stigma and discrimination [39, 41, 43, 44, 49–51, 54, 58]

Psychological distress, such as anxious/fear about anal cancer screening and the finding an abnormality [32, 35, 40, 43, 44, 48, 55, 57]

Feel shame or embarrassment [39, 41, 43–45, 47, 50, 57]

Negative experience [47, 48]

Having other health concern (i.e., living with HIV) [40]

Vulnerability [48]

Attitude

Patient willingness [44, 45, 50, 56, 57]

Perceptions of self-efficacy [41, 43, 52]

Safer sex fatigue [21]

Reduced HIV concern [21]

Not believing anal Pap tests are only necessary for people who have anal intercourse [22]

Positive normative beliefs [52]

Positive behavioral beliefs regarding treatment [52]

Belief about HPV-related disease or HRA [43]

Not Interested in or dislike anal screening and potentially toughing faeces [32, 45, 54, 57]

Sensitive nature of discussing sexual identity and sexual practices and screening itself [35, 48]

Self-esteem, male affect their masculinity [44]

Internalized racism [48]

Connection the HRA to the Sexual Behavior “Bottom” Identity [49]

Social support

Recommended by the healthcare provider [21, 44, 56, 57]

Good communication and relationship with the healthcare provider [37, 43, 46, 48, 56]

Good communication with supportive sexual partner [50]

Close relationship experiences the disease of prostate cancer [49]

Discussion with female friend [49]

Social support [54]

Lack of recommendation from healthcare professional [40, 47, 57]

Healthcare system factors

Efficiency of the system

Improving health check-up processes [31, 50, 51, 55]

Development of clear screening guideline [56, 58]

Healthcare system inefficiencies, such as the absence of a clinical routine, unclear delineation of responsibilities, weak health information system, health service not meet the specific need, ambiguous policy guidelines [38, 43, 48, 54, 58]

Differences in HIV care practices [38]

Resources

Training healthcare providers [40, 51, 56, 58]

Lack of human resources [34, 41–43, 58]

Inadequate infrastructure [53, 58]

Lack of funding and financial resources [38, 58]

Lack of political will and commitment from the government [58]

Dissemination

Creation of dissemination style on health education [40]

No promotion in media [34]

Healthcare provider factors

Professional

Well trained healthcare provider with adequate knowledge, expertise and good communication skill [43, 44, 48, 50]

Concern about the effectiveness and acceptability of anal screening [34, 38, 53]

Lack of professional training [53]

Lack of time [34, 42]

Attitude

Non-judgment [48]

Bias, apathy and discourtesy from the doctor’s side [48, 51]

Forgetting (i.e., lack of reminders) [34]

Unnecessary anxiety, discomfort, embarrassment for patients [34]

Low patient interest [34]

Relationship

Good communication and relationship with the patient [43, 48, 56]

Poor communication with the patient [38, 43]

Screen-related factors

Screening method

Self-anal exams [44, 45]

Preferred anal examinations to be performed only by a medical expert [35]

Partner anal exams [45]

Self-anal examination can be taught by the clinician [41]

Discomfort feelings from anal cancer screening [32, 33, 35, 38, 39, 43, 50, 54, 57]

Inadequate physical flexibility to conduct an anal self-examination [35, 45]

Concerned about hygiene before anal self-examination [35]

Screening environment

Screening performs in familiar environment [59]

Friendly environment [48]

Unfriendly therapeutic environment [50]

Cost

 

Cost of screening [39, 57]

Time consuming [39]

Convenience

Convenience of the screening method [44]

Lack of convenience of the screening [39]