Skip to main content

Table 1 The basic characteristics of the included studies

From: Robotic single site versus robotic multiport hysterectomy in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author (year)

Country

Study type

Sample size

Stage

Age (year)

BMI (kg/m2)

Treatment of lymph nodes

Study quality (NOS scores)

Corrado et al

(2016) [17]

Italy

Retrospective case–control

RSSH: 23

RMPH: 46

IA/IB

64 (35–85)

59 (38–88)

26.6 (17.8–33.6)

28.5 (20–34.6)

Lymphadenectomy

8

Corrado et al

(2020) [18]

Italy

Retrospective case–control

RSSH: 76

RMPH: 149

I-II

Not reported

33 (30–54)

34 (30–55)

Lymphadenectomy

8

Mereu et al. (2020) [19]

Italy

Prospective case–control

RSSH: 25

RMPH: 51

IA-IIIC

61.4 ± 10.4

61.9 ± 11.4

24.8 ± 3.8

29 ± 6.1

SLNB

8

Moukarzel et al. (2017) [20]

United States

Retrospective cohort

RSSH: 14

RMPH: 13

IA/IB

53 (45–77)

62 (41–82)

24.6 (20.2 –29.6)

27.2 (21–29.7)

SLNB

7

Zhang et al

(2024) [21]

China

Retrospective cohort

RSSH: 23

RMPH: 28

IA/IB

54.78 ± 5.88

57.29 ± 4.70

25.42 ± 1.21

26.09 ± 1.50

Lymphadenectomy

8

  1. Data are expressed as number, mean ± standard deviation or median (range)
  2. RSSH robotic single-site hysterectomy, RMPH robotic multiport hysterectomy, BMI body mass index, SLNB sentinel lymph node biopsy, NOS Newcastle–Ottawa Scale