Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 5 Effectiveness of LCN2, CD24, and Lactoferrin as a predictor set for discriminating between the control and SU5416 treatment arms.*

From: Expression profiling of blood samples from an SU5416 Phase III metastatic colorectal cancer clinical trial: a novel strategy for biomarker identification

1.

All cases pooled (67 cases from both trials)

 

Trial arm

Predicted trial arm

  

Control

SU5416

% Correct

 

Control

26

5

84

 

SU5416

6

30

83

 

Total

32

35

84

2.

Jackknifed classification matrix for all cases pooled (67 cases from both trials)

  

Control

SU5416

% Correct

 

Control

26

5

84

 

SU5416

8

28

78

 

Total

34

33

81

3.

Prediction subset (randomly selected 34 cases) from all cases pooled

  

Control

SU5416

% Correct

 

Control

13

1

93

 

SU5416

4

16

80

 

Total

17

17

85

4.

Validation subset (randomly selected 33 cases) from all cases pooled

  

Control

SU5416

% Correct

 

Control

11

6

65

 

SU5416

5

11

69

 

Total

16

17

67

  1. *Cross-validation results are displayed for two different approaches. In section 2, one case is dropped at a time and its group membership predicted from the other cases. In sections 3 and 4, cross-validation is carried out by using a randomly selected half of the cases as a training set and the remaining half as a test set. Section 4 summarizes the prediction accuracy achieved when the group in section 3 is used as a training set. Note: When results of one trial were used in predictive classification of results from the other trial, the accuracy in cross-validation was 86% and 77% for the training and testing set, respectively (with a Cohen's kappa value of 0.5507).